Also from the Chronicle of Philanthropy, check out the article and interactive map which compares an “Opportunity Index” with a “Giving Ratio.” The overall conclusion is that more affluent regions have a tendency to be less generous in their giving. Again, you find that the southern part of the US and the Rocky Mountain regions are more generous givers.
“Giving Ratio” for this article is the percent of income donated to charity, as compiled from IRS Schedule A itemized deductions (I’m not sure I want to know how they obtained this information).
“Opportunity Index” is a score assigned based upon the socioeconomic measurements of different locations.
Now, you should assume that these are very, very, broad brushstrokes. The data is by no means comprehensive, and leaves a lot of unanswered questions. However, it might be statistically significant enough to suggest a pattern, which is all that the article does. The percentages are not disparate enough to provide much confidence in their conclusions (that wealthier people tend to give less, and vice versa), but it is interesting to see what the numbers say about different locations. How does YOUR county fare?
Properly written documents can be compelling. The same document, badly-written, can be dismissed, and the important message lost.
One of my pet peeves is a meme with a message full of grammar errors. Even worse is a YouTube video rife with misspellings. Below is a unfortunate production of an otherwise touching Memorial Day video, set to music of a popular Christian band. The very first image we see contains four misspellings.
Not only is the message lost, but it is an extreme disservice to the Christian rock group, Casting Crowns, to have their music devalued by childish mistakes.
The LinkedIn article (“linked” below) by Travis Bradburry is a quick tutorial on the proper application of 20 commonly misused words. I see examples of each of these frequently. I won’t claim to have never misused them, myself, but I try to proofread carefully to avoid contributing to the global mangling of the English language.
How has the Internet evolved over the past 15 years? How about since 1975 (slide 7)? Mary Meeker is renowned as a data analyst, and presents a yearly report on internet trends. Some observations:
More internet usage outside of the US than within.
Growth is in mobile technology. TV and Desktop usage is static.
51% of time spent on the Internet is via a mobile device – up from 12% in 2008.
Contrast with 42% of time spent today on the internet is via a computer (desktop or laptop), compared with 80% in 2008 – yet, the total number of computer users has remained somewhat stable (no significant growth).
There are 197 slides, but it’s worth perusing to see how the internet has evolved over the past 15 years, and where today’s major influences lie.
Check out this interactive map from The Chronicle of Philanthropy. What intrigues me at first blush is that the darker areas (greater percentage of giving) seems to overlap areas of the United States where you will find more strongly held religious beliefs within the general population.
Does that mean that religious people are more generous? Probably too little data to draw a conclusion, but worth exploration.
Below is a link to a Pew Research web page that shows the United States and location of various stages of religious belief, as compiled from a religious landscape survey (click on image to go to website). There does seem to be strong overlap.
Intriguing article from Sheryl Sandberg and Adam Grant in the New York Times, “Women at Work” section, highlighting the differences between women and men in the office workplace. Even when roles are equal – or when a woman is in a superior role – women either self-appoint or are appointed the “office housework” tasks more frequently than men.
The most obvious tasks are getting coffee, making copies, and such. However, there are also the tasks of taking meeting notes, mentoring new hires, and planning office events, which seem to be assigned to women more frequently than to men.
The article not only points out how both men and women can fall into this rut, but also how to work out of the roles to provide more effective leadership and more productive results.
Where do YOU fall in this mix, and are you stuck there?